Spec Comparison: 2021 Ford Bronco Sport vs. Jeep, Subaru, and Others


We’ve examined how Ford’s truncated, tallened, and toughened-up Escape compares in opposition to Jeep’s Renegade, Compass, and Cherokee; now let’s measurement the 2021 Ford Bronco Sport up in opposition to the broader compact SUV aggressive set. Keep in mind that the Escape is primarily tasked with broad-market attraction, so its choices span a wider value, efficiency, and functionality spectrum. The Bronco Sport is extra centered on enabling journey journey, however it’s not the one one on this record with such a spotlight. So how does it stack up?

<!–

–>

2021 Ford Bronco Sport Inside Individuals House vs. the Competitors

Tall patrons will delight within the class-leading entrance and rear headroom afforded by the all-new 2021 Ford Bronco Sport’s tall, safari-stepped boxy roofline. Entrance legroom can be among the many class leaders, whereas rear legroom and entrance and rear hip and shoulder room are nearer to common. However when the numbers get multiplied out, total the Bronco Sport delivers 58.Zero cubic toes of entrance passenger area, rating second solely to the Subaru Forester (60.1), and its rear area nails the category common at 49.5 cubes. That’s fairly spectacular, given the Bronco Sport’s shortest at school total size. (Tall individuals who parallel park rather a lot, take discover!)

Base Mannequin Inside Dimensions, Largest to Smallest Entrance Head Room (in) Entrance Leg Room (in) Entrance Hip Room (in) Entrance Sh’lder Room (in) Rear head Room (in) Rear Leg Room (in) Rear Hip Room (in) Rear Sh’lder Room (in) Entrance Go. House (cu ft) Rear Go. House (cu ft) Complete Go. House (cu ft)
Subaru Forester 41.2 43.3 54.1 58.2 39.6 39.4 53.6 57.2 60.1 51.6 111.7
Ford Escape 40.0 42.4 55.2 57.6 39.3 40.7 53.3 56.0 56.5 51.8 108.4
Ford Bronco Sport 41.5 42.4 55.0* 57.0 41.7 36.9 53.0* 55.6 58.0 49.5 107.6
Honda CR-V 40.1 41.3 55.1 57.9 39.2 40.4 49.5 55.6 55.5 50.5 105.9
Nissan Rogue 41.1 54.1 41.5 57.1 39.2 53.4 38.5 55.9 56.4 48.8 105.2
Chevrolet Equinox 40.0 40.9 54.2 57.2 38.5 39.9 51.7 55.5 54.2 49.3 103.5
Jeep Cherokee 39.4 41.1 53.8 57.6 38.5 40.3 49.9 55.1 54.0 49.5 103.5
Mazda CX-5 39.7 41.0 55.2 57.1 39.0 39.6 55.3 54.8 53.8 49.0 102.8
Hyundai Tucson 39.6 41.5 55.6 57.1 39.2 38.2 54.5 55.5 54.3 48.1 102.4
Kia Sportage 39.3 41.5 54.3 57.1 39.1 38.2 51.2 55.1 53.9 47.6 101.5
Toyota RAV4 39.5 41.0 54.3 57.8 39.5 37.8 47.7 56.4 54.2 47.1 101.3
*Estimated

2021 Ford Bronco Sport Inside Cargo House vs. the Competitors

A lot of what the Bronco Sport’s shorter rear overhang takes away, that safari-step roof offers again by way of uncooked numbers. At 32.Zero cubic toes with the seats up, 65.Zero with them down, the Bronco Sport measures precisely 1.Zero cubic foot under the category common for every measure. However cargo area is what cargo area does, and Ford has ensured that continuously hauled journey gear suits simply. For instance, with the rear seat folded down, two mountain bikes match simply inside with the entrance wheels eliminated (the equipment crew will even promote you a bar that mounts to the ground for securing the bikes’ forks).

Cargo Capability,
Largest to Smallest
Cargo, Seats Up (cu ft) Cargo, Seats
Down (cu ft)
Subaru Forester 35.4 76.1
Honda CR-V 39.2 75.8
Nissan Rogue 36.5 74.1
Toyota RAV4 37.6 69.8
Ford Escape 33.5 65.4
Ford Bronco Sport 32.0 65.0
Chevrolet Equinox 29.9 63.9
Hyundai Tucson 31.0 61.9
Kia Sportage 30.7 60.1
Mazda CX-5 30.9 59.6
Jeep Cherokee 25.8 54.7

2021 Ford Bronco Sport Outer House vs. the Competitors

As we’ve already famous, the Bronco Sport is the runt of this litter by way of size, stretching 7.1 inches shorter than the category common. However it is usually the widest and tallest within the class, at 74.Three inches broad and 67.9–69.1 inches tall, relying on the trim variant. These extremes land the Bronco Sport smack in the midst of the category by way of total area effectivity (inside individuals and cargo area divided by the amount of the outside field).

Exterior Measurement, Sorted by House Effectivity Wheel-base (in) Size (in) Width (in) Top (in) Effectivity*
Subaru Forester 105.1 182.1 71.5 67.5 29.1%
Honda CR-V 104.7 182.1 73.0 66.1 28.5%
Nissan Rogue 106.4 182.8 72.4 65.9 28.3%
Hyundai Tucson 105.1 176.2 72.8 65.0 28.0%
Ford Escape 106.7 180.5 74.1 66.1 27.9%
Ford Bronco Sport 105.1 172.7 74.3 67.9-69.1 27.7%
Kia Sportage 105.1 176.4 73.0 64.8 27.5%
Mazda CX-5 106.2 179.1 72.5 66.2 27.4%
Toyota RAV4 105.9 180.9 73.0 67.0 27.1%
Chevrolet Equinox 107.3 183.1 72.6 65.4 26.6%
Jeep Cherokee 106.4 182.0 73.2 65.7 25.5%
*Complete passenger vol + Seats-Up cargo vol divided by L x W x H exterior vol

2021 Ford Bronco Sport Energy and Weight vs. the Competitors

Though it borrows the Escape’s drivetrains, routing the exhaust to remain out of hurt’s method when off-road and tuning the engine energy and torque barely to go well with the Bronco Sport’s completely different mission alter the Escape’s engine specs. That, plus the added gear to maintain it transferring safely via the tough stuff means the Bronco Sport ranks a bit decrease on the weight-to-power record than the Escape. However in its 2.0-liter turbo guise, it ranks fifth at school behind the Cherokee 2.0T by way of weight to energy (although weight-to-torque reverses that order, placing Bronco Sport fourth). On the different finish of the spectrum, the wee little 1.5-liter three-banger EcoBoost engine ranks fourth from the underside of each lists, so don’t go racing for pinks within the base Bronco Sport.

Energy and Weight, Finest to Worst Engine Measurement (L) HP (SAE internet) Torque (lb-ft) Curb Wt. (lbs)* Wt./Pwr (lb/hp)
Chevrolet Equinox I-Four turbo 2.0 252 260 3,450 13.7
Jeep Cherokee V-6 3.2 271 239 3,750 13.8
Ford Escape I-Four turbo 2.0 250 275 3,550 14.2
Jeep Cherokee I-Four turbo 2.0 270 295 4,000 14.8
Ford Bronco Sport I-Four turbo 2.0 245 275 3,650 14.9
Mazda CX-5 I-Four turbo 2.5 250 320 3,850 15.4
Kia Sportage I-Four turbo 2.0 240 260 3,700 15.4
Toyota RAV4 I-4 2.5 203 184 3,400 16.7
Honda CR-V I-Four turbo 1.5 190 179 3,350 17.6
Kia Sportage I-4 2.4 181 175 3,300 18.2
Ford Escape I-Three turbo 1.5 180 177 3,300 18.3
Nissan Rogue I-4 2.5 181 181 3,350 18.5
Subaru Forester flat-4 2.5 182 176 3,450 19.0
Mazda CX-5 I-4 2.5 187 186 3,550 19.0
Ford Bronco Sport I-Three turbo 1.5 181 190 3,500 19.3
Hyundai Tucson I-4 2.4 181 175 3,500 19.3
Chevrolet Equinox I-Four turbo 1.5 170 203 3,300 19.4
Hyundai Tucson I-4 2.0 164 151 3,300 20.1
Jeep Cherokee I-4 2.4 180 171 3,650 20.3
*Lightest obtainable mixture

2021 Ford Bronco Sport Towing Capability vs. the Competitors

Many adventurous pursuits require toys that must journey alongside behind your adventuremobile, and the Bronco Sport is aimed toward adventurers. And whereas the 1.5-liter Bronco Sport can tug simply as a lot trailer as its sibling Escape, the two.0-liter is restricted to 2,200 kilos—1,300 fewer than the Escape can handle. Maybe it’s the twin-clutch rear axle or the shorter final-drive gearing, however you’ll must go a bit smaller on the travel-trailer or boat (perhaps 16 toes tops for both).. Each numbers are nonetheless class-competitive and can mean you can tow a small pop-up camper, a pair of jet-skis or snowmobiles, a quad-runner, or one other like-sized object.

Towing Capacities (non-hybrid fashions) Powertrain Most Towing Capability (lbs)
Chevrolet Equinox 2.0L 4-cyl. Turbo 9-speed Computerized 3,500
Ford Escape 2.0L 4-cyl. Turbo 8-speed Computerized 3,500
Toyota RAV4 2.5L 4-cyl. 8-speed Computerized 3,500
Ford Bronco Sport 2.0L 4-cyl. Turbo 8-speed Computerized 2,200
Ford Bronco Sport 1.5L 3-cyl. Turbo 8-speed Computerized 2,000
Ford Escape 1.5L 3-cyl. Turbo 8-speed Computerized 2,000
Hyundai Tucson 2.4L 4-cyl. 6-speed Computerized 2,000
Jeep Cherokee 2.4L 4-cyl. 9-speed Computerized 2,000
Kia Sportage 2.4L 4-cyl. 6-speed Computerized 2,000
Kia Sportage 2.0L 4-cyl. Turbo 6-speed Computerized 2,000
Mazda CX-5 2.5L 4-cyl. Turbo 6-speed Computerized 2,000
Chevrolet Equinox 1.5L 4-cyl. Turbo 6-speed Computerized 1,500
Honda CR-V 1.5L 4-cyl. Turbo CVT Computerized 1,500
Hyundai Tucson 2.0L 4-cyl. 6-speed Computerized 1,500
Subaru Forester 2.5L 4-cyl. CVT Computerized 1,500
Toyota RAV4 2.5L 4-cyl. 8-speed Computerized 1,500
Nissan Rogue 2.5L 4-cyl. CVT Computerized 1,350

2021 Ford Bronco Sport Gas Economic system vs. the Competitors

Right here’s one other space the place Ford has but to finish testing and announce outcomes, however our guestimate place-holders assume the Bronco Sport lands in comparable weight lessons to the all-wheel-drive Escape fashions, however with much less aerodynamic bodywork (doubtlessly increased drag coefficient and frontal space) and with the two.0-liter variant getting a shorter axle ratio than within the Escape. We’re guessing that may value the child Bronco 1 freeway mpg relative to the Escape with each engines. We then assume the Badlands mannequin’s water-cooled fancier all-wheel-drive system and shorter axle ratio (3.81:1 versus 3.47:1) could value an extra 1 mpg of freeway and a couple of mpg of metropolis economic system. Name it an estimated 26/30/28 mpg metropolis/freeway/mixed for the 1.5-liter; 21/29/24 for the two.0-liter. This locations the bottom 1.5-liter Bronco Sport within the prime half of the category, with the two.0-liter rating under common.

Gas Economic system Powertrain EPA metropolis EPA hwy EPA comb
Honda CR-V 1.5L 4-cyl. Turbo CVT Computerized 28 34 30
Toyota RAV4 2.5L 4-cyl. 8-speed Computerized 26-28 34-35 30
Ford Escape 1.5L 3-cyl. Turbo 8-speed Computerized 27 33 30
Nissan Rogue 2.5L 4-cyl. CVT Computerized 26-27 34-35 29-30
Honda CR-V 1.5L 4-cyl. Turbo CVT Computerized, AWD 27 32 29
Subaru Forester 2.5L 4-cyl. CVT Computerized 26 33 29
Nissan Rogue 2.5L 4-cyl. CVT Computerized, AWD 25-26 32-33 28-29
Chevrolet Equinox 1.5L 4-cyl. Turbo 6-speed Computerized 26 31 28
Ford Escape 1.5L 3-cyl. Turbo 8-speed Computerized, AWD 26 31 28
Ford Bronco Sport 1.5L 3-cyl. Turbo 8-speed Computerized, AWD 26* 30* 28*
Mazda CX-5 2.5L 4-cyl. 6-speed Computerized 25 31 28
Toyota RAV4 2.5L 4-cyl. 8-speed Computerized, AWD 25-27 32-33 27-29
Chevrolet Equinox 1.5L 4-cyl. Turbo 6-speed Computerized, AWD 25 30 27
Mazda CX-5 2.5L 4-cyl. 6-speed Computerized, AWD 24 30 26
Ford Escape 2.0L 4-cyl. Turbo 8-speed Computerized, AWD 23 31 26
Jeep Cherokee 2.0L 4-cyl. Turbo 9-speed Computerized 23 31 26
Kia Sportage 2.4L 4-cyl. 6-speed Computerized 23 30 26
Hyundai Tucson 2.0L 4-cyl. 6-speed Computerized 23 28 25
Chevrolet Equinox 2.0L 4-cyl. Turbo 9-speed Computerized 22 29 25
Hyundai Tucson 2.4L 4-cyl. 6-speed Computerized 22 28 25
Jeep Cherokee 2.4L 4-cyl. 9-speed Computerized 22 31 25
Ford Bronco Sport 2.0L 4-cyl. Turbo 8-speed Computerized, AWD 21* 29* 24*
Chevrolet Equinox 2.0L 4-cyl. Turbo 9-speed Computerized, AWD 22 28 24
Mazda CX-5 2.5L 4-cyl. Turbo 6-speed Computerized, AWD 22 27 24
Jeep Cherokee 2.4L 4-cyl. 9-speed Computerized, AWD 21 29 24
Hyundai Tucson 2.0L 4-cyl. 6-speed Computerized, AWD 22 25 23
Kia Sportage 2.4L 4-cyl. 6-speed Computerized, AWD 22 26 23
Hyundai Tucson 2.4L 4-cyl. 6-speed Computerized, AWD 21 26 23
Jeep Cherokee 3.2L V-6, 9-speed Computerized 20 29 23
Kia Sportage 2.0L 4-cyl. Turbo 6-speed Computerized 20 28 23
Jeep Cherokee 2.0L 4-cyl. Turbo 9-speed Computerized, AWD 20-21 26-29 22-24
Jeep Cherokee 3.2L V-6, 9-speed Computerized, 4WD 18-19 24-27 21
Kia Sportage 2.0L 4-cyl. Turbo 6-speed Computerized, AWD 19 24 21
*Estimates primarily based on Escape weight class with barely worse aerodynamics and shorter axle gearing (2.0L).

We’re as keen as you might be to get all the ultimate numbers and spherical up these autos—and the anticipated newcomers within the class—as quickly as attainable. Maintain it proper right here!







































































The publish Spec Comparison: 2021 Ford Bronco Sport vs. Jeep, Subaru, and Others appeared first on MotorTrend.



Source link