Uber, Lyft Blocked From Classifying Drivers As Contractors In California | Carscoops

Uber, Lyft Blocked From Classifying Drivers As Contractors In California | Carscoops



Uber and Lyft can’t classify their drivers as unbiased contractors in California, in response to the newest court docket ruling.

The determination is a significant defeat for the 2 ride-hailing corporations and a results of a lawsuit filed by state Attorney General Xavier Becerra and the cities of Los Angeles, San Diego and San Francisco. Uber and Lyft have 10 days to attraction in opposition to a preliminary injunction, with the latter saying it should pursue.

The two ride-hailing companies have been accused of not conforming to the Assembly Bill 5, one in every of California’s new state legal guidelines that require corporations to categorise their staff as staff in the event that they management how the employees do their jobs or work is a part of their enterprise, Reuters experiences.

“This is a resounding victory for thousands of Uber and Lyft drivers who are working hard – and, in this pandemic, incurring risk every day – to provide for their families,” Los Angeles City Attorney Mike Feuer mentioned in an announcement.

Read Also: Prosecutors Seeking 2-Year Prison Sentence For Engineer Who Stole Google’s Autonomous Secrets

California voters will resolve on Proposition 22, a poll measure to categorise app-based drivers as contractors, this November. Lyft mentioned in an announcement that “drivers do not want to be employees. Ultimately, we believe this issue will be decided by California voters and that they will side with drivers.”

Uber alternatively, will doubtless shut down briefly in California for a number of months if the ruling doesn’t overturn, in response to the corporate’s CEO Dara Khosrowshahi, who spoke to CNBC.

“If the court doesn’t reconsider, then in California, it’s hard to believe we’ll be able to switch our model to full-time employment quickly”, Khosrowshahi said.

The decide mentioned that Uber and Lyft had themselves responsible if their resisting state legal guidelines contributed to any “far-reaching” results an injunction may need. “Defendants may not evade legislative mandates merely because their businesses are so large that they affect the lives of many thousands of people,” the decide wrote.



Source link